Betfairmethods.com

[gnella]

anybody a member of this site?i see it advertised on home page here and wondered if anyone knows about it

[fazzyc]

Its a site owned by one of our mods over at CLH and the banner is a favour from me.Any good? couldnt tell you coz too busy too try but i will say our own gwerzal has worked behind the scenes so yes it is all legitte etc

[amalteja]

I don't know whether you get better advices with paid membership, but free stuff is full of nonsenses, just check out "Back all horses at 1.05" article. When I wrote a negative comment it was deleted, of course, but people have been misled this way, especially young people, newbies to betting on exchanges. You can try several "methods' and get burnt badly. If it's really owned and/or moderated by one of your mods... hm... either he's a bit careless or ignorant. Just my humble opinion, sorry.

[gnella]

I don't know whether you get better advices with paid membership, but free stuff is full of nonsenses, just check out "Back all horses at 1.05" article. When I wrote a negative comment it was deleted, of course, but people have been misled this way, especially young people, newbies to betting on exchanges. You can try several "methods' and get burnt badly. If it's really owned and/or moderated by one of your mods... hm... either he's a bit careless or ignorant. Just my humble opinion, sorry.

anyone like to add to this,would love to hear from some members

[Ark Royal]

... If it's really owned and/or moderated by one of your mods... hm... either he's a bit careless or ignorant. Just my humble opinion, sorry.

If you read Fazzy's post correctly you will see he said a mod at CLH.
CLH is cashloopholes and is a sister site to this one and has different mods to us here.

AR

[amalteja]

Thanks, AR. I think that I read it as it said.


Its a site owned by one of our mods over at CLH

I really don't like to write negative comments on anything, I'd like to be proven the opposite. What I suggest, just go to the site and read some of the free methods, comments made by visitors and the replies they are getting (ie backing the field at 1.05, trading 1.5 goals market with odds never found but "possible" in theory, and similar...) and make your own conclusions. What I don't understand though, why they don't take those articles down instead of keeping them on site for extended time and confusing people. I was just about to ask fazzyc why is he supporting the site with a banner when gnella started the thread. Hope something good comes out of this discussion.

[fazzyc]

im not supporting as stated im doing someone a favour thats all

[gnella]

ok,still have not got definative answer about this site so bumping thread.i am genuine and not looking for conflict,i want to know if anyone has joined it and how they got/get on

[fazzyc]

gnella ill get the guy to come on here and answer your questions

[turncoat]

Hi. I'm one of the Admin over at Betfair Methods. Admittedly, I must say that theoretically, the method you have pulled out should work but does not. However, on the site, there are over 100 different methods, some paid and some free.

Why so many if some aren't too good? The honest truth... Google. If we only put all the really good ones up then we'd have less pages to please Google. Terrible I know but it has to be done that way. That is not to say that everything is sh*t nor does it mean that all the free stuff is their for Google. In fact, we feel that every method is there to extend the knowledge of all visitors.

Obviously, members of this forum in particular are incredibly knowledgeable in this field and are therefore likely to find some of the methods somewhat tedious but the site offers methods for both amateur and professional gamblers.

I tell you what, I will offer a 100% FREE FULL PRO Membership to the FIRST TWO UKBT members who PM me. You must however be a Pro Member of UKBT just so that your review is fully credible.

[turncoat]

One of the two free Pro memberships has gone to 'Lovejoy' - ONE MORE REMAINS

[turncoat]

Both FREE PRO MEMBERSHIPS have gone.

One to Lovejoy and the other to Gnella.

[dave58]

Thanks , turncoat.
I personally use several very good systems that make me consistent profits, and I'm not ashamed to say that some (alright then, most !) came from originally crap ones that I have come across, but seen some potential for development - so that's why I always look at new methods/systems, just in the hope that one might provide that litle 'spark' for another successful one.
Given that, I would always suggest having a look at new stuff, just make sure the rose-tinted specs are safely hidden away, 'cos you're not going to find the road to El Dorado laid out ready for you - you've got to walk the first few paces on your own , and negotiate the stepping-stones en route !

Dave


edit - and I've just realised I've missed out on a freebie - grr !!

[cuccu13]

This site (Betfair Methods) is a purely scam.
Writed some negative comments,but naturally cancelled.

System 1: "Lay Trap 6 in greyhound races,this Trap won only 9% times"...
Proofed only 9 days....it is a joke?

Free system: "Back Favourite in horse racing with loss recovery and Stop At Winner,each day there is always a favourite winner"...
And if favourite win at 13th race? You have 12 consecutive losing run...

Rubbish.

[dave58]

Well, that's what this site is for - honest opinions !
Must admit, think they could do a bit better than these two, though !

[ExcitableBoy]

Ooooooo errrrrrrrr.

I have to say that this has all the ingredients for a really good thread. Only on page two and there's been questions of integrity, namecalling, gauntlets thrown down and gauntlets picked up!!

Well done to Lovejoy and Gnella for accepting the challenge.

And well done to turncoat for having the balls to stand behind his product and allowing two serious heavyweights we all respect to carry out the review.

As Harry Hill would say: "FIGHT!!"

[anonamouse]

to be fair, anyone giving lovejoy the keys to the castle ain't gonna be hiding anything for long. detective lovejoy recently made chief superintendant :)

[gnella]

Well, that's what this site is for - honest opinions !
Must admit, think they could do a bit better than these two, though !

and they have dave,have had a look around the site and i am very impressed.the free methods they give do leave a lot to be desired and i personally feel they need to re-think putting them up for free even though they are worthless to a point.turncoat has explained why in an earlier post.
when you gain membership and get to see the good stuff you will be pleasantly surprised and wonder how guys who can create these methods cannot sell their concepts better.
their methods cover just about every area of betfair like horses,footie,greyhounds,exchange and casino plus more so there should be something to suit all.
all the methods i have looked at are simple to implement which is a major plus and some have very good reasoning behind them and are no relation to the crap they give for free.
i have recieved free membership but i have not been asked to promote the site in any way or to write a review and if i did not like what they do i would give back my membership.i am a trusted member here and i hope all will take me at my word about BETFAIRMETHODS and not think i have been BOUGHT.
i would recommend anyone thinking of joining to not hesitate as it certainly does what it says on the tin

[anonamouse]

i can only quote spongebob & patrick in reply to gnella's revelations...

http://i1.glitter-graphics.org/pub/942/942141n2m9v28r4v.gif

[dave58]

Hi, fella - we all know you well enough to take your word for things, no worries there - with yourself and lovejoy I'm sure we're all guaranteed pukka feedback.

Dave

[Tatty]

i can only quote spongebob & patrick in reply to gnella's revelations...

http://i1.glitter-graphics.org/pub/942/942141n2m9v28r4v.gif


Reminds me of my fave Sid Waddell line (well one of the faves, too many to choose from)

"Ooh, he's sweating like Sponge Bob caught in a mangle"



re this service,

If gnella gives it the thumbs up it's do for me.

[lovejoy]

I have been looking around the site on and off all day and there is plenty to take in, too much to do in one day in fact. I have thoroughly enjoyed looking through the various trading methods and hope to use some of them within the next week. There are a few optimistic methods on there which turncoat has already owned up to this has not attempted to hide from. I cannot see any reason to believe that anyone who has joined has been misled as to the contents and considering so much of it is free, I consider it to be a decent site. As gnella has already stated there is something for everyone so anyone who joins should not be disappointed.
I also found turncoat to be very welcoming and he has not influenced my view of this site in any way. I will post again when I have had more time to look around.

[turncoat]

Thank you both Gnella and Lovejoy. I really appreciate what you have said. If any one has any questions regarding the site then do let me know -- If you think they will help others then post your questions here... If not, just PM me.

[amalteja]

I wish you both, gnella and lovejoy, good luck, and please let us know of your findings. However, if I find a nonsense "method" like back every horse in field at 1.05 and it's still not taken down from the site, and admin is surpriced when people say it's not working - "oh, it used to work before, I don't know what's going on now" and after many comments and people probably losing money trying this one out, this is still on site, I rest my case.... (how can you trust any other method if the first one you stumble upon is a complete BS?)

[turncoat]

Sorry that it was the first method you stumbled across. Many of the free methods are:
a) Ideas that have potential. Think about it, if that method worked using some sort of bot then money would be made.
b) To keep Google happy.

[amalteja]

OMG, that method cannot work with any sort of bot! If you said lay the field at 1.05, I'd understand, but this? To keep google happy???

[Ascot-Lad]

Turncoat, this is not intended as a negative post, and i hope you don't take it as such. You've said that BM is using goggl towards its marketing plan (nothing wrong with that in the normal course of business, obviously) - i've also noticed that affiliates are welcome - so it seems clear that widespread membership is the site's goal, and i therefore wonder what your forecasts are, not for the business plan, but for the viability of the popular and presently successful methods to continue to the benefit of your paying (and increasing) membership.

Is this something you can answer other than to say the "likelihood" is that the number of members (and the value of their betting/trading) will always be minute in comparison to the vast amounts flowing through the exchanges in any given event?

If, indeed, liquidity is no issue at all, then why would the site be providing these methods anyway, instead of just creaming off the exchange profits for itself?

[Tatty]

On the subject of betting in-running, did anyone else notice the winner at Brighton yesterday matched at 1000 in running. Dunno how much for but some poor sod has his nuts in a sling this morning.
Probably just undone 9 months work !!!

Madness

[anonamouse]

some poor cnut layed £200 @ 1000 last year in running... that won aswell

http://blogs.suntimes.com/scanners/punch.gif

[lovejoy]

The people who lay in running at these prices do it day in and day out, they know the risks and they know that one day they will get caught for a lot of money. If you earn and average of £200 per race laying 1000 shots in running it soon amounts to a lot of money. Bear in mind they must have the funds in their Betfair accounts to be able to lay at these prices so they a fully geared up to do it.
This is only for you if you have got the funds and the balls.

[turncoat]

In response to everything:

With regards to the 1.05 Horse Racing system, this is 0.8% of all the systems we offer TODAY. But I do understand that if you see one shit method, you'll expect every other method to be shit.

However, if you read the 36 comments on this particular method, you will see that some people have found that with some bot software... It works: http://betfairmethods.com/betfair-horse-racing-methods/back-every-horse-at-1-05-on-betfair/

With regards to keeping Google Happy. You have to have a lot of regular content, and at the time, this is what I could come up with to add to the site so that Google were happy and the sites SERPs remained high.

As bizarre as it may seem Ascot-Lad, but I just don't have the time to bet. Betfair Methods is not the only website I run and the number of sites I run is growing constantly. Most of the methods on the site will always have the required liquidity to be viable.

Membership to the site is now ONLY £27.00 instead of £47.00 but this price will only last until 1st August.

[lovejoy]

Yesterday, I played around with one of the racing systems that was posted on there and showed a profit of 8 points from 7 races. I may need to play around with it a bit more, it depends on today's results as there are a lot of selections. I am also looking at slightly tweaking one of the exchange games systems which has high possiblities, more about that later.

lovejoy

[cjpotter]

Hi Lovejoy,

Which racing system was that? I am a member on there.

With the exchange games I can never quite decide if they are worth the bother, any methods always lose at some point but I've found a few that have regular fluctuations in profit so that if you had a program like xfeeder running in test mode you could switch it into real mode after profits have taken a nose dive knowing that they would pick up again. The other key thing is not to be too greedy as well I reckon!

[lovejoy]

Hi cjpotter,

It is the system that uses the Racing UK thing and Timeform. I have had an odds on winner and 3 placed so far today which is in line with expectations. With the exchange games I am looking to set up xfeeder with a limit to the amount of bets placed on it and try for smaller profits and less liability. As you say it is better not to get too greedy and take smaller profits.

[fazzyc]

Intresting guys hmmmm, im watching this thread

[Ascot-Lad]

As bizarre as it may seem Ascot-Lad, but I just don't have the time to bet. Betfair Methods is not the only website I run and the number of sites I run is growing constantly. Most of the methods on the site will always have the required liquidity to be viable.

Membership to the site is now ONLY £27.00 instead of £47.00 but this price will only last until 1st August.


So now only the famous £27 instead of the just-as-famous £47 and the incredibly-famous £97, lol :D

It seems you prefer building websites and marketing them to making cash directly from your own products. I'm not being critical, honestly: some people are better suited to certain areas of life than others. Gold and spades come to mind.

Good luck to you, i hope everyone finds value.

[Ascot-Lad]

Can you throw in a dinner service, too? :D

[turncoat]

Are you sure you're not being critical? :O

£27 is the price atm whilst this thread is live and busy to give UKBT the chance to purchase memberships cheaper.

[Ascot-Lad]

Are you sure you're not being critical? :O




Lol, i did say "honestly", didn't i?

Business is business, after all.

[turncoat]

Haha. Fair play.

Btw, the method Lovejoy is looking at and so far showing a profit is: http://betfairmethods.com/betfair-pro-methods/secret-method-to-pick-a-winning-horse-on-betfair/

[stuartd]

How many times do people have to tell you to stop posting in old thread in an attempt to get your post count up

[LeicDave]

Warrior you are fucking pissing me off I have written at least 3 times and others have as well you are spamming the shit out of every betfair thread STOP FUCKING DOING IT is that clear enough for you or do I need to put it even bigger.

[dave58]

All his posts deleted - warrior, please take note, you're annoying some of our most respected members - any more and I'll hit the ban button.